
Rigid foam insulation is a popular choice in construction due to its unique properties. This article discusses its cost-effectiveness compared to other insulation types.
Cost Comparison
Insulation Type | Cost per Square Foot |
---|---|
Rigid Foam | $0.80 – $2.50 |
Fiberglass Batts | $0.30 – $1.50 |
Spray Foam | $1.00 – $3.00 |
Mineral Wool | $0.70 – $2.00 |
Effectiveness Analysis
- Rigid Foam: High R-value (R-4 to R-6 per inch)
- Fiberglass Batts: Moderate R-value (R-2.9 to R-3.8 per inch)
- Spray Foam: Very high R-value (R-5.5 to R-6.5 per inch)
- Mineral Wool: Moderate R-value (R-3.1 to R-4.3 per inch)
Benefits of Rigid Foam Insulation
- Moisture Resistance: Does not absorb water, preventing mold growth.
- High Thermal Performance: Superior insulating properties compared to many alternatives.
- Lightweight and easy to handle: Simplifies installation.
Drawbacks of Rigid Foam Insulation
- Higher initial cost compared to fiberglass batts.
- Environmental concerns: Some types contain harmful chemicals.
- Limited soundproofing capabilities.
Statistical Analysis
Effectiveness Metrics
Insulation Type | R-value | Cost Effectiveness (R-value per $1) |
---|---|---|
Rigid Foam | R-5 | 2 |
Fiberglass Batts | R-3.5 | 11.67 |
Spray Foam | R-6 | 6 |
Mineral Wool | R-4 | 5.71 |
Mind Map Overview
- Rigid Foam Insulation
- Cost
- Effectiveness
- Applications
- Materials
- Environmental Impact
Conclusion
Rigid foam insulation presents a balanced choice regarding cost and effectiveness. While initially more expensive than some options, its superior performance can lead to long-term savings through energy efficiency.


