1 Answers
The Mazda CX-30 stands out in its class, offering a compelling mix of style, performance, and value.
Comparative Analysis of Mazda CX-30 and Competitors
Key Competitors
- Honda HR-V
- Toyota C-HR
- Subaru Crosstrek
- Ford Bronco Sport
- Nissan Qashqai
Value Proposition Criteria
- Price
- Standard Features
- Fuel Economy
- Resale Value
- Warranty
Comparison Table
Feature | Mazda CX-30 | Honda HR-V | Toyota C-HR | Subaru Crosstrek | Ford Bronco Sport |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Starting Price | $23,000 | $22,000 | $24,000 | $23,500 | $28,000 |
Fuel Economy (MPG) | 25/33 | 28/34 | 27/31 | 28/33 | 23/26 |
Resale Value (5 Years) | 65% | 63% | 58% | 60% | 57% |
Warranty (Years) | 3/36,000 | 3/36,000 | 3/36,000 | 3/36,000 | 3/36,000 |
Strengths of Mazda CX-30
- Premium interior quality and aesthetics.
- Engaging driving dynamics with strong performance.
- Advanced safety features and technology integration.
Weaknesses of Mazda CX-30
- Less cargo space compared to some rivals.
- Higher base price compared to segment averages.
Consumer Preferences Survey
The following mind map visually represents consumer preferences when choosing a compact SUV:
- Design
- Exterior
- Interior
- Performance
- Engine Power
- Handling
- Technology
- Infotainment
- Safety
- Value for Money
- Price
- Resale Value
Conclusion
Overall, the Mazda CX-30 provides an excellent balance of value compared to its competitors, boasting superior interior quality and engaging drive, though it should be weighed against slightly higher pricing and reduced cargo space.
Upvote:506